Preface by Marc Wright
Introduction by Marc Wright
Measurement by Susan Walker
Employee Engagement - a Beginner's Guide by Fiona Robertson
Creating an Internal Communication Strategy by Marc Wright
What makes a competent communicator by Liam Fitzpatrick and Sue Dewhurst
How to influence friends and win people (over) by Rob Briggs
Connecting with the Unconnected by Ruth Findlay
Recognising and rewarding employees by Ike Levick
Communication at the Coalface by Lindsay Bogaard
Management Theories X, Y and Z
McClelland's Needs-Based Model of Motivation
Writing skills by Marc Wright
How to commission a Video by Kelly Kass
Better Presentations by Fiona Robertson
Line Manager Communication by Patrick Williams
The Concern Scale by Marc Wright
Adapt or disappear - how intranets and related technologies are re-defining internal communications by Paul Miller
Appreciative Inquiry by Jonathan Priest
Facilitation skills for line managers by Marc Wright
Leadership Communication by Bill Quirke
Managing your CEO by David Keel
Communicating through a Merger or Acquisition by Marc Wright
Make Change Last by Caisa Alpsten and Ulla Mogestad
New CEO - case study in communicating by Lee Smith
Knowing your corporate governance risks and responsibilities by Andrew Riley
Communicating through diversity by Chornay Marshall
CSR and the Communication Professional by Ongrid Selene
Storytelling and Business - The Alien's Have Landed! by Ian Buckingham and Paul Miller
Moving Minds by Simon Wright
Perspective - The Hidden Dimensionby Mike Klein
Cultural Barriers by Marc Wright
Using pictures to convey strategy by Hilary Scarlett
Communication Champions by Fiona Robertson
Better Emails - The W-H-Y Technique by Marc Wright
Creating meaningful dialogue at work by Jacqui Hitt
Advanced Employee Engagement by Kevin Keohane
How to create an award-winning change programme by Nicky Flook
Social Media - an introductionby Euan Semple
First steps in implementing Social Media by Marc Wright
Blogging for the Finance Sector by Yang-May Ooi
Blogs and blogging by Marc Wright
Print or online newsletters by James Pringle
Writing for the web by Fiona Robertson
Appreciative Inquiry is a radically alternative approach to organisational change.
If the thinking behind traditional change management strategies can be summarised as, ‘Let’s look for the problems around here and fix them’, an AI approach would be ‘Let’s find out what’s already working around here and allow these positive experiences to influence the rest of the organisation.’
The assumption of AI is that there are already lots of good things going on within most organisations but, because they are ad hoc and unrecognised, they have little influence. AI brings these positive influences out into the open in the form of stories that can be shared, and whose positive influence can spread in a viral way.
The term Appreciative Inquiry is based on the interviews with members of organisations which deliver these positive stories, the first step in any AI engagement. But of course it’s far more subtle than simply accentuating the positive because the whole mindset changes when you turn away from a re-engineering mentality and focus on people’s achievements instead.
The concept of AI was developed by two American organisation behaviour professors, David L. Cooperrider and Suresh Srivastva, his doctoral supervisor. Their paper, Appreciative inquiry (Cooperrider & Srivastva, 1987), a theory of organizing and method for changing social systems, is regarded as one of the more significant innovations in action research.
Positive Image, Positive Action: The Affirmative Basis of Organizing". In Srivastva and Cooperrider et al Appreciative Management & Leadership. www.stipes.com/aichap2.htm
Action research is distinguished by the fact that researchers involve their ‘subjects’ as co-researchers and is surely a progression from the more detached approach embodied in time and motion studies.
Action research is now a cornerstone of organisation development practice. Gervase R Bushe of the Simon Fraser University in Canada sums up AI as a method of changing social systems as,
“An attempt to generate a collective image of a new and better future by exploring the best of what is and has been. These new images, or "theories", create a pull effect that generates evolution in social forms.”
Appreciative Inquiry with Teams, Gervase R. Bushe Ph.D. Published in The Organization Development Journal, 16:3 (1998), pp.41-50. www.gervasebushe.ca/aiteams.htm
The thing that caught my imagination when I first went to a presentation about Appreciative Inquiry by Organisational Consultant, Ann Radford, is the simple notion she described of how one’s ‘energy’ can be directed by negative assumptions :
“If you talk about negative stuff, that’s where people’s energy will go.”
Ann Radford, AI Resource Centre www.aradford.co.uk
Energy, in this sense, refers to the process of engaging and focusing one’s attention towards a particular subject. For example, if I describe a system, organisation or team in terms of its dysfunctional qualities, then you will immediately have a generally pessimistic and guarded approach towards that system.
On the other hand, if I describe that system in terms of its successes but suggest that there might be ways to make it work even better, you will see it in a more positive light. The way you frame things completely changes the context - and hence people’s attitudes and expectations.
This principle also applies to corporate communication, which is why it tweaked my cord. There’s more than a subtle difference between a communication that has been sanitised and one that sets out to accentuate the positive. The assumptions we make about things in the way we describe them and the type of questions we ask about them become part of that thing’s reality.
So before you open your mouth on any issue, consider where you want people’s energy to go and think about the assumptions implied in your approach.
Margaret Philips specialises in organisational development and change and has used the AI approach for several years, though now she tends not to label it as such.
“The way AI differs from change processes that are more interventionist is that the research is conducted by the participants themselves and the discoveries that emerge are their own.
We start by putting people into pairs, with a list of questions. They interview each other for about twenty minutes and then summarise their partner’s responses to the rest of the group. Great care goes into formulating the questions, which are designed to help people build up a comprehensive picture of their role within the organisation and how they have contributed to its success”.
From these revelations about positive behaviours, the group chooses those they would like to prioritise for wider implementation.
If all this sounds a bit happy clappy, especially to the hard boiled cynical Brit (to which tendency I belong), I suggest you suspend your disbelief. If you are in the business of leadership and organisational change, and haven’t already come into contact with AI, then you may well find it to your advantage.
As Margaret Philips and many other AI practitioners have discovered, the effects of AI are sustained because ownership starts and ends with the individuals in the group. There is never a stage at which a big idea, formulated in part by an outside consultant, is then tossed back to the team for implementation.
“The ideas for change are all theirs, as are the processes for delivering them. It all happens there in the room; they own the whole process.”
Margaret Philips can be contacted at mphilips@dircon.co.uk or margaret@m-p-a.org.uk
AI has survived the test of time and, unlike many change methodologies, there’s a mountain of academic research that proves its effectiveness. The main challenge is that AI is not something you can easily do at the office unaided, not at least in the first instance.
It is essentially a facilitated change process that relies on a skilled practitioner to take the organisation/team though the process, step by step. There will be many cynics and disbelievers to be brought on board. Some will find it hard to recognise the good and positive behaviours that surround them. It takes a good facilitator to sustain the momentum, not to mention a certain amount of courage for a manager to expose his people to such ideas.
AI is an idea from which there is no going back and it has to involve the whole workforce otherwise, what’s the point? AI was born during the era when the corporate grip was being loosened and rigid hierarchies swept away. Perhaps in the post-dotcom era where the future is less secure, managers will be less inclined towards more liberal strategies. But the underlying principle of directing people’s energy towards the good and the positive cannot be regarded as a passing fashion.
Appreciative Inquiry: Change at the Speed of Imagination, Jane Magruder, Watkins & Bernard Mohr, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2001
Thin Book of Appreciative Inquiry by Sue Annis Hammond. Published by Thin Book Publishing Co 1998 (2nd Edition)
Page Information
|
Wiki Information |
Recent PBwiki Blog Posts |